Personal Injury and Accident FAQs
Below are some of the most common initial questions our clients have about their personal injury or accident cases. You can use the quick links below to jump to individual categories or search for specific questions in the search box.
Jump to a Category
Bicycle Accidents
Boating Accidents
Car Accidents
Medical Malpractice
Pedestrian Accidents
Personal Injury Law
Slip and Fall Accidents
Toxic Mold Injuries
Truck Accidents
Wrongful Death
Find the Answer You Need
Negligence per se is a special type of negligence wherein the defendant is found negligent as a matter of law because they violated a statute that is designed to protect against the type of accident or harm caused by their actions. This concept is important because proving negligence is a central factor in any accident injury case. Under normal circumstance, proving negligence requires that your lawyer show four things: A defendant who violated a law that was meant to protect the public—e.g. a driver who caused a wreck by running a red light—can be found negligent per se; thus, the injured party can bypass proving the first two elements of regular negligence and skip to showing whether the violation was the “cause in fact” of the plaintiff’s injury. It is absolutely critical to note that in Florida only violations of non-traffic penal statutes will trigger negligence per se. So, for example, in a drunk driving accident, showing that the driver was drunk would establish negligence pe se, because the law that prohibits drunk driving is a penal statute. However, showing that the driver was speeding (a traffic law violation) may not be sufficient to trigger negligence per se; although, it can still be used as evidence of negligence. Learn More: Drivers and passengers can suffer an array of bodily and emotional injuries ranging from minor aches and pains to life-altering injuries. The most common car accident injuries include: Learn More: There are five critical Florida car accident laws that all drivers should know. Learn More: Maybe. Florida’s new Wireless Communications While Driving Law (§316.305, Fl. Stat.), which went into effect in 2020, will likely affect negligence and liability assignments in car and motor vehicle accident claims. This is because Florida operates according to the principle of comparative liability, which states that both parties in an accident essentially share fault. As such, shifting the liability onto the other driver is important to increase the amount of compensation you can recover. To do that, though, you must prove the defendant acted in a negligent manner. In particular, the new law includes a provision (F.S. §316.305(3)(d)) stating that cell phone billing records can be used as evidence of negligence in the event of an accident that results in death or personal injury. This provides your personal injury lawyer with another tool to prove the other party’s liability in your car accident case. Learn More: Most car accidents are not “accidents.” Instead they are caused by a range of factors often attributable to another driver’s negligence. If you’ve been in a car accident in Florida, it was likely caused by one of these 6 factors. Learn More: In July 2019, Florida passed The Wireless Communications While Driving Law (Florida Statutes 316.305), which made texting while driving a primary traffic offense. Law enforcement officers can now pull over and ticket drivers specifically for texting while behind the wheel. Previously, drivers could only be ticketed for texting if they were pulled over for another violation, e.g. speeding. The primary reason for the new law is to combat distracted driving. The new law specifically prohibits operating a motor vehicle while “manually typing or entering multiple letters, numbers, symbols or other characters into a wireless communications device.” So, “texting” includes email, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media apps. However, the new law does not apply in two important situations. First, devices used for navigation are exempt from the law, both smartphones and built-in navigation systems. Second, drivers are allowed to text while vehicles are “stationary,” which includes being stopped red lights or stop signs. Learn More: Yes, for two reasons: to protect your health and to protect your legal rights. Additionally, if you plan on filing a lawsuit against the at-fault driver in the accident, medical records detailing your injuries, diagnosis, treatment regimen, and medical costs will act as some of the most important forms of evidence in your injury case. All of this will have a significant impact on your ability to collect compensation. Learn More: Maybe. If you or a family member have been injured in a car accident that was caused by a negligent driver, you are legally allowed to seek financial compensation from the at-fault party. However, injured parties must file a personal injury lawsuit within four years of the date of the accident. This period is known as the “statutes of limitations,” and it applies to injuries sustained in a range of accidents including car, truck, and motorcycle accidents. However, wrongful death plaintiffs only have two years to file a lawsuit in Florida, including accidental deaths due to car, truck, and motorcycle crashes. Because the stakes are so high, it is always in your best interest to speak to a qualified personal injury and accident lawyer as soon as possible. It’s critical that you be aware of what time limitations apply to your particular case and take the right steps at the right time to successfully recover the compensation you deserve. Failing to file your lawsuit on time could result in your injury claim being rejected by a judge, regardless of the proof you have. Learn More:
Car Accidents and Injuries (8)
Despite what you might think based on most lawyer advertisements and billboards, it’s impossible to give exact figures for how much a truck accident victim can recover because each victim’s losses and damages are different and will be determined by the facts of the case. The better question to ask is “what types of damages can I recover?” Truck accident victims have the right to sue the at-fault parties for economic (“special”) and non-economic (“general”) damages. Punitive damages could also be on the table in extreme cases, but you should talk to a lawyer to discuss that option. Economic damages are your compensation for the out-of-pocket expenses related to the injuries you sustained in the truck accident. They include: Non-economic damages are harder to quantify, and often include future harms or injuries that lack specific “replacement” values. Values are given to these items by their impact on your quality of life: Learn More: Determining fault and liability in a car accident is relatively simple. If Dwight rear-ended Andy, Dwight is probably at fault and responsible for Andy’s damages. But liability for damages in a commercial truck accident is much more complex: It could include the driver, the driver’s employer, the trucking company, the truck manufacturer, third-party contractors, and the insurance companies who insure each of the aforementioned. The identification and determination of the liable parties is key because each of them will likely carry separate insurance policies that could potentially all pay out separate amounts. Plus, each of these entities or parties will have to be named separately in the lawsuit. To make matters more murky, there are national safety regulations that govern trucks and truck drivers, which may impact the various parties’ culpability and liability for your accident. Florida has adopted most of these commercial vehicle safety regulations (F.S. §316.302) as well. This means there are legal nuances at play in a truck accident that make it critical that you hire an experienced personal injury lawyer to handle your case who knows these rules and regulations. Learn More: It depends on the cause of the accident. When Michael runs into Meredith with his car, Michael is at fault and Meredith will bring a personal injury lawsuit against him. But if Michael is driving a semi-truck when a piece of cargo falls off and hits Meredith’s car, the number of different parties potentially responsible for Meredith’s injuries multiplies. Because each of these parties must be identified, commercial truck accidents are more complicated to pursue than car accidents. To take a simple case, the truck and trailer components of a semi-truck are often owned separately and by corporate entities, not individuals. This results in potentially two separate companies being responsible for your injuries. Furthermore, you must sue the corporate entities themselves, not someone at the company, and figuring out who and what company or corporation to sue can sometimes be difficult, especially if the trucking company is a nationwide company. Learn More: Regardless of the exact cause of a semi-truck accident, there are six types of accidents that tend to occur more frequently when commercial vehicles are involved. Learn More: Even though we use the term “accident,” most truck crashes aren’t accidents at all. Rather, driver negligence, equipment malfunction, environmental factors, or a mix of all of three most commonly cause the accident. “Driver error,” a broad category of actions that are under the direct control of the truck driver, is the leading cause of truck accidents. On the other hand, occasionally a part of the truck or cargo hold will fail and cause a wreck. These instances may not be attributable directly to driver error, but various parties can still he held negligent for: The impacts of both driver error and mechanical failures can be exacerbated by weather or road conditions, and they can lead to a number of different types of truck accidents. Learn More:
Commercial Truck Accidents (5)
Yes. Personal Injury & Accident Law Center always provides potential clients with absolutely free consultations. In addition to in-person consults, we offer clients the option to hold their consultation via telephone or video call to give more freedom and flexibility. If you’ve been the victim of a negligent driver, property owner, medical practitioner, or animal owner, call us now at 561.372.3800 to schedule your free consultation. Learn More: Despite what most lawyer advertisements and billboards lead you to believe, it’s impossible to give exact figures for how much you can recover from an injury. That one accident settled for $400,000 in no way implies that yours will too. The fact of the matter is that each victim’s losses and damages are different, and the total amount recoverable will be determined by the facts of the case. The better question is, “What types of damages can I recover?” Accident victims have the right to sue the at-fault parties for economic (“special”) damages and non-economic (“general”) damages. Punitive damages could also be on the table in extreme cases. Economic damages are your compensation for the out-of-pocket expenses related to the injuries you sustained in the accident, including: Non-economic damages often include future harms or injuries that lack specific “replacement” values. You and your lawyer will assign values to these items by their impact on your quality of life, such as: Learn More: An Independent Medical Examination (IME) is a tool that insurance carriers use to examine their own customers that have been injured in an accident to suspend their medical benefits or limit their medical treatment under Personal Injury Protection (PIP) insurance. Unfortunately, the examinations are: However, the IME physician must have the same licensing as your treating physician (e.g. a neurologist must examine you if you are being treated by a neurologist), the insurance company is required to pay for the IME, and they cannot make you travel unreasonable distances. Learn More: No. An Independent Medical Examination (IME) is not the same as a Compulsory Medical Examination (CME). An IME is requested by an injured person’s own insurance company to suspend medical benefits or limit medical treatment. A CME, on the other hands, can be requested by either party’s insurance carrier, and they occur after litigation has begun as a means to defeat the lawsuit or mitigate the damages imposed on the at-fault party. Learn More: Yes. Unfortunately, you are required to attend an Independent Medical Examination in most instances. Your insurance carrier has a fundamental right to an IME to curtail potential fraud. If you refuse to submit to or to attend a lawfully granted IME, the insurance company will cite it as an “unreasonable refusal” and you will be deemed to have breached the insurance policy. Breaching the contract could release the insurance carrier from all liability for further medical payments. Do note, though, that failure to attend the IME is not necessarily an “unreasonable refusal” to attend. For example, missing the appointment because of a family emergency is not the same as purposefully staying home. The insurance carrier has the burden of proving the failure to attend was unreasonable. Learn More: No. Fortunately, you do not have to pay an insurance-requested Independent Medical Examination (IME). The insurance company must pay for the Independent Medical Examination, and they must give you sufficient notice of any upcoming examination so you can make arrangements to attend. In addition, the insurance company cannot make you travel unreasonable distances to attend the IME. They are required, unless no physician exists, to select an IME physician that is in the municipality where you are receiving treatment or in a location reasonably accessible to you (that is, within 10 miles from your residence). Learn More: Because the law states that the results of an Independent Medical Examination and only usable if the physician that conducts the exam has the same licensing as your treating physician. This means that an insurance carrier cannot use a neurologist’s examination to stop paying your chiropractic medical bills, nor a podiatrist’s report to avoid paying for neurological medical treatment. Unfortunately, for those being treated by multiple physicians, this could mean undergoing multiple IMEs, one for each medical specialty. Learn More: Yes! The Personal Injury & Accident Law Center exclusively bills on a contingency fee basis. Plus, our 100% “No Win, No Fee” guarantee means that our clients won’t pay anything unless they recover money—either from a settlement, judgment, or jury verdict. The contingency fee arrangement benefits injured clients by removing the financial barrier to bringing a personal injury lawsuit, which could disincentivize some seriously injured parties from seeking the legal help and monetary recovery they deserve. Learn More: It depends. Our firm exclusively bills on a contingency fee basis. This means that we receive a percentage of the total amount recovered—either from a settlement, judgment, or jury verdict. The exact contingency fee amounts change as the case moves forward, but the most common contingency fee structure is: The contingency fee structure benefits our clients because: On top of this arrangement, we offer free case evaluations to all potential clients. It’s essential that we review the general aspects of your case and discuss your legal options up front. Learn More: Your insurance company will send you notice of your upcoming Independent Medical Examination. In advance of the exam, your relevant medical records will be sent to the physician. The physician may also receive a letter from the insurance company pushing them to do or check on certain things, which the IME doctor will use to guide the examination. They may be interested in questions like: The exam itself will probably be a typical physician exam: They will ask you about your accident and injuries, collect a medical history, review the treatments you’re receiving, and conduct small tests to check your range of motion or grip strength. As you go through the exam, be sure you are truthful about your symptoms and injuries. But also, only provide the information that is requested. Regular doctor-patient confidentiality does not exist with the IME physician, so do not elaborate or let yourself get too conversational. Learn More: Many clients inadvertently hurt their cases and reduce their compensation during the Independent Medical Examination (IME). The IME is a tool that insurance carriers use to justify suspending payments of medical benefits or limiting treatment options in order to reduce your payout as much as possible The conducting physician is likely hand-picked by the insurance company and will be expected to help them do that. Though the exam is obligatory, avoid: Learn More:
Personal Injury Law (11)
Florida’s premises liability law (F.S. §768.0755), which governs slip and fall accidents, allows people who have been injured from slipping, tripping, or falling to sue for damages. But, the statute also requires the injured party to prove that the owner or business was negligent and liable. Proving negligence requires you to show that the business or property owner had actual knowledge or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition. Since businesses will likely take steps to fix a hazardous condition that they actively know about, most slip and fall cases rely on proving constructive knowledge. Constructive knowledge means that the business should have known about the dangerous condition. You or your lawyer can prove constructive knowledge by showing that: After an accident, a business will immediately fix the hazard so that no other patrons are injured. So, documenting your surroundings after a slip and fall accident is critical to ensuring a provable and winable case. Learn More: People often don’t take slip and fall accidents as seriously as they should because many falls do not cause injuries. But one out of five falls does cause a serious and costly injury such as a broken bone or a head injury. These injuries can drastically reduce a person’s movements and hamper their quality of life. Slip and fall victims tend to have one or more of the following injuries: Learn More: The total cost to a victim to recover from a slip and fall injury can include medical costs, lost wages, and a reduced quality of life. And these costs are not negligible! CDC data show that in 2018: To bring that to the individual level, the most recent data available from CDC estimate that the average cost of a hospitalization to treat a slip and fall injury is $40,000. On top of that, victims saw average lost work costs of $56,000 (in 2010-dollars). All told, a slip and fall accident could easily cost you around $100,000! Critically, these estimates do not account for reduction in your quality of life. If you lost the ability to coach your son’s little league team or couldn’t care for your aging parent, your life would be negatively impacted, but there wouldn’t be an easily assignable price tag. Learn More:
Slip and Fall Accidents (3)
Yes. Florida has strict laws against operating a boat or other watercraft while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. For adults over 21, the same blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit of .08 applies to boat operators as to drivers. Similar testing and citation laws also apply. In addition, any boat operator under 21 with a BAC of .02 or higher is in violation of Florida law. Learn More: Probably. Florida law states that boat operators must report accidents with “over $2,000 apparent aggregate damage” to the proper authorities. So, technically, not every boat accident must be reported, but it can be very difficult to assess the full range of damages in these instances. You may be dealing with property damages to the exterior of the boat(s), broken personal property inside the boat, and physical damages to persons on the boats. As such, it’s a good idea to make a report of any boating accident to ensure documentation is clear and complete in case a personal injury claim needs to be made. Learn More: Data from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission shows that inattention is the most common cause of boating accidents. The second and third are operator inexperience and excessive speed. Altogether, these three factors account for nearly half of all Florida boating accidents. Learn More: In 2020, there were a total of 534 reported injuries due to boating accidents, an increase of 15% from 2019. Cuts, gashes, and lacerations were the most common type of injury. Broken bones, contusions, head and neck injuries, and back injuries were also common. Of the 534 boating injuries, the number of each injury are as follows: Learn More: If a person does not operate a boat with the legally required duty of care, they can be held liable for damages that result from their negligence. To successfully prove negligence and recover damages for your injuries, you must show that 1) the boat operator failed to operate the boat in a reasonably safe manner and 2) that this failure caused the injury. Common negligent conduct includes: Learn More: It depends. Assessing fault and liability for boat accident injuries can be messy. You need to consider a range of factors including the parties involved and the cause of the accident. Depending on the circumstances, multiple parties may be liable for your injuries: Learn More: Yes. Under Florida law, injury victims can recover compensation for their injuries from negligent parties. But, unlike with passenger car and commercial truck insurance, Florida currently does not require liability insurance coverage for boats. This means, if you are injured in a boat accident, there is a fairly good chance that you will not be covered by an insurance policy for your immediate medical expenses. Your only option to get compensation for your injuries may be to sue the liable parties for damages. But there is also no guarantee that they will have the funds needed to cover your expenses, and litigation can take a long time. Hiring a boat accident lawyer can help smooth this process out so you get compensation for your injuries in a timely fashion. A lawyer can investigate what insurance policies are in play, who might be liable, who has the ability to pay, and advise you properly. Learn More:
Boating Accidents (7)
Yes. Certain types of molds like Stachybotrys chartarum (“black mold”) produce mycotoxins, which can cause serious health problems when they are continuously inhaled by people living in homes, apartments, condos, or other spaces. However, with prolonged exposure almost any type of mold can cause health problems. Common symptoms of long-term exposure to toxic mold include: The symptoms of toxic mold exposure vary, but they are more likely to be severe in people with certain conditions: Learn More: Yes, tenants have the right to compensation for injuries sustained from exposure to toxic mold. However, the presence of mold is not a sufficient condition for a lawsuit—there must also be quantifiable losses or damages. Although dealing with a mold infestation or an uncaring landlord may be frustrating and potentially harmful, neither frustration nor future damages are good causes for a lawsuit. To oversimplify greatly, “no damages, no case.” If you have suffered sizeable financial losses or lasting medical injuries as a result of exposure to mold, then you may have a strong basis for filing a personal injury claim. Given that toxic mold injury claims are difficult, you should do everything you can to properly preserve and document your claim. Learn More: Maybe. Currently, there are no specific mold laws in Florida. Some local housing codes may include such wording, but it will not be systematic. However, landlords must abide by the so-called “implied warranty of habitability,” meaning that they have a responsibility to provide safe and livable housing to tenants. Importantly, a responsibility to maintain the integrity of a property is not the same thing as being legally liable in a personal injury lawsuit arising from mold exposure. For tenants who simply have mold in their units that they want removed, the first line of defense in Florida is the Landlord-Tenant Act (83.51, Fl. Statutes), which requires landlords to comply with applicable building, housing, and health codes, and to: maintain the roofs, windows, doors, floors, steps, porches, exterior walls, foundations, and all other structural components in good repair and capable of resisting normal forces and loads and the plumbing in reasonable working condition. A secondary shield for tenants against intransigent landlords is section 468.84 ff., Fl. Statues, which regulates the licensing of professional mold remediators. According to this statute, anyone hired to conduct mold inspection or mold remediation must maintain specialty licenses from the state. This improves the likelihood that mold assessment and remediation will be done properly. It also means that landlords aren’t allowed to bring in a cheaper contractor or do the mold remediation themselves, unless they have such a license. Learn More: Every tenant should know that they have the right, pursuant to Florida’s Landlord-Tenant Act (Ch. 83, Fla. Stat.), to a habitable housing environment. If you have not been injured but simply want your landlord to remediate the mold, the law provides you with a few alternative options to remedy the situation: Learn More: Tenants that have suffered lasting or serious medical injuries or financial losses from exposure to toxic mold, may have the option to get compensation for their injuries through a personal injury lawsuit against your landlord. Though this should never be your first course of action, it is an option to protect your rights and your wellbeing. Given that toxic mold injury claims are difficult to pursue and negligence is difficult to prove, you should do everything you can to properly preserve and document your claim as soon as you suspect that toxic mold may be the cause of your ongoing medical issues: Learn More:
Toxic Mold Injuries (5)
Pedestrian Accidents (3)
Yes.
Florida has “Right of Way” laws that state who must yield, or give the right of way, to whom in an intersection. Generally, pedestrians have the right of way when crossing a street, provided that they are crossing inside a crosswalk. However, Section 316.130, Florida Statutes, details a more fulsome set of rules that pedestrians must follow, including:
- Pedestrians must only walk on the left shoulder of the road (i.e. against the flow of traffic),
- Drivers must stop to let a pedestrian who is at least halfway across the road pass,
- When crosswalks are available, pedestrians must not cross at any place except the crosswalk,
- Every pedestrian crossing a road outside a marked crosswalk shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles,
- Pedestrians must cross the road at 90-degree angles to the opposite curb.
Florida’s pedestrian laws are primarily in place to keep pedestrians safe. But following these rules has the knock-on effect of reducing the potential liability a person might bear in a pedestrian accident. If the opposing attorney can show that you were violating one or more of these laws, then you can be held partly liable for the accident that occurs as a result.
Learn More:
Yes, in general Florida law grants that pedestrians have the right of way when crossing the street. However, pedestrians give up the right of way if they cross the street outside of a designated crosswalk.
This is somewhat of an oversimplification of the full set of Florida’s pedestrian statutes (Section 316.130, Florida Statutes). The nuances of the provisions are key, and the rules are in place not only to help keep pedestrians safe but also to reduce potential liability on a pedestrian’s part for any accidents. Disobeying one or more of these pedestrian laws could result in physical harm and in a more difficult path forward for your pedestrian accident lawsuit. If the driver’s defense attorney can show that you were violating one of these laws, then you can be held partly liable for the accident that occurs as a result, which then decreases your total compensation.
Learn More:
Florida is the #1 most dangerous state for pedestrians. Statistically, certain surprising situations are more likely to lead to pedestrian accidents. According a 2019 study, pedestrians should exercise caution in these five high-risk scenarios:
- Outside of Intersections: Contrary to expectations, only 25% of pedestrian fatalities occurred in or near an intersection. If you’re only being careful at crosswalks, you are only being safe 25% of the time.
- Local Roads and Highways: Only 22% of the total pedestrian fatalities occurred on residential and downtown streets. A much higher percentage (59%) happened on main roads that carry a city’s local and regional traffic.
- Nighttime: 76% of pedestrian fatalities occur after dark, and another 4% occur during dawn and dusk. All told, time of day and lighting conditions impact 80% of the total fatalities.
- Elderly More at Risk: Unfortunately, the 50+ population is overrepresented in pedestrian accident deaths. This age group, especially those 75+, is more likely to experience challenges seeing, hearing, or moving, further exacerbating the problem.
- Lower-Income Communities: Because low-income communities are less likely to have well-maintained sidewalks, marked crosswalks, and streets designed for pedestrian safety, they see a disproportionate number of pedestrian fatalities.
Learn More:
Our best studies have concluded that medical malpractice and medical error are both wide ranging and underreported. The numbers of deaths attributable to medical error has been increasing in the last 20 or so years, mostly because of a renewed effort to properly categorize the causes of death. An Institute of Medicine study in 1999 concluded that between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die in hospitals due to medical errors. A 2010 study increased the number to 180,000. This was updated again in a 2013 study that suggested that 210,000–440,000 deaths per year were attributable to medical malpractice. Most recently, a comprehensive and detailed report from Johns Hopkins University in 2016 argued that medical errors may be responsible for over 250,000 deaths each year, making medical error the third leading cause of death in the U.S. Learn More: Florida’s “free-kill” loophole concerns wrongful death lawsuits in the context of medical malpractice. Specifically, it refers to a restrictive exemption buried in the Florida Wrongful Death Act that limits who can and cannot recover certain damages in a medical malpractice-specific wrongful death lawsuit. The provision is a bit complicated. According to §768.21(8), Fl .Stat., a parent whose adult child dies or, vice versa, an adult child whose parent dies, provided that the person who died did not have a spouse or minor child, is forbidden from recovering pain and suffering damages in a wrongful death lawsuit where the death is due to medical malpractice. In other words, in cases where medical malpractice led to a wrongful death, pain and suffering damages are only available to: In effect, this significantly limits the number of wrongful death actions filed on behalf of unmarried adults who have adult children because without pain and suffering damages the cost to litigate a malpractice case may be more than any potential recovery. Florida is the only state in the nation with this type of an exclusion, and it is estimated that more than half the state’s population falls into this no-man’s land. The “Free-Kill” nickname originated because, as the logic goes, a medical professional would prefer a dead patient to an injured and living one because under this exemption a dead patient poses no financial liability, whereas a severely injured—but alive—patient does. Learn More: Maybe. Deaths caused by medical malpractice or hospital error are included under the statutory definition of “wrongful death,” which means that deceased person’s survivors and beneficiaries have the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of the decedent. However, “filing a lawsuit” and “being a party to a lawsuit” are different. Under Florida law, only a decedent’s personal representative can actually file a wrongful death lawsuit. Additional beneficiaries may be included as parties to the lawsuit. On the other hand, Florida’s so-called “Free-Kill” loophole (§768.21(8), Fl .Stat.) states that when medical malpractice causes a wrongful death, pain and suffering damages are only available to: This Florida-specific provision effectively bars wrongful death actions filed on behalf of unmarried adults who have adult children because without pain and suffering damages the cost to litigate a malpractice case may be more than any potential recovery. Learn More: It depends. Florida law states that only a personal representative (aka “executor of the estate”) can initiate a wrongful death lawsuit. Florida law further states that personal representatives must be Florida residents. If the deceased has a will that names a personal representative, this person will be responsible for overseeing the administration and distribution of the deceased’s estate, including initiating wrongful death litigation on their behalf. If the decedent did not have a will, then a probate court will appoint someone. Although only the personal representative is allowed to initiate the lawsuit, other beneficiaries such as the surviving spouse, children, parents, adoptive siblings, or other blood relatives can be parties to the wrongful death lawsuit and receive a portion of the compensation. Learn More: It depends. Although Florida law states that only the decedent’s personal representative can initiate a wrongful death lawsuit, other beneficiaries and survivors can recover damages based on their familial relationship and dependence on the deceased. But who does and does not qualify to be awarded damages can be complicated and depend on multiple factors. The statutory division of damages and list of parties can further complicate matters during an emotional time. Florida’s Wrongful Death statute details how and in what order damages are to be allotted to the various beneficiaries: Learn More: The definition of wrongful death in Florida’s “Wrongful Death Act” reads as follows: When the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act, negligence, default, or breach of contract or warranty of any person, including those occurring on navigable waters, and the event would have entitled the person injured to maintain an action and recover damages if death had not ensued, the person or watercraft that would have been liable in damages if death had not ensued shall be liable for damages as specified in this act notwithstanding the death of the person injured, although death was caused under circumstances constituting a felony. The critical parts are underlined for clarity, but this definition is written to satisfy certain legal standards, not to be understood by the average person. To simplify, think of it like this: A wrongful death lawsuit is a personal injury lawsuit that is brought on behalf of the injured party because the injured party died. If we now re-read the definition with some of the extra verbiage taken out, hopefully it will make more sense. A wrongful death is a death: (1) caused by the wrongful act, negligence, default, or breach of contract or warranty of any person…(2) [provided that] the event would have entitled the person injured to maintain an action and recover damages if death had not ensued. Importantly, a “wrongful act” can encompass negligence, careless driving, assault and battery, manslaughter, and even murder. Wrongful death lawsuits are handled in civil court and are separate from any criminal charges which might be brought against the negligent party in criminal court. The purpose of a wrongful death tort is to compensate the surviving family for the financial losses they suffered because of the responsible party’s negligence. Learn More: Two years. The statute of limitations is the period of time in which you can file a lawsuit for a specific harm. For wrongful death claims the statute of limitations is two years. Under Florida law, the personal representative is the only one who can initiate a lawsuit, and if the personal representative does not file the wrongful death lawsuit before that two-year statute of limitations is up, their right to hold the negligent party accountable and receive compensation for the unnecessary loss of a loved one will expire. Statutes of limitations vary. It is critical to be aware that this two-year window is much shorter than the four-year statute of limitations that governs most personal injury lawsuits, including medical malpractice suits. Learn More:
Wrongful Death in Florida (7)
Our best studies have concluded that medical malpractice and medical error are both wide ranging and underreported. The numbers of deaths attributable to medical error has been increasing in the last 20 or so years, mostly because of a renewed effort to properly categorize the causes of death. An Institute of Medicine study in 1999 concluded that between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die in hospitals due to medical errors. A 2010 study increased the number to 180,000. This was updated again in a 2013 study that suggested that 210,000–440,000 deaths per year were attributable to medical malpractice. Most recently, a comprehensive and detailed report from Johns Hopkins University in 2016 argued that medical errors may be responsible for over 250,000 deaths each year, making medical error the third leading cause of death in the U.S. Learn More: At its core, medical malpractice refers to professional negligence by a healthcare provider whose treatment fell below the accepted standard of care and thus caused harm, injury, or death to a patient. This means that not all negative interactions with a doctor nor all injuries are sufficient conditions for a medical malpractice lawsuit. However, medical malpractice and medical error encompass an array of acts (and failures to act) by medical professionals. Intensive care units, operating rooms, and emergency departments all have high error rates with serious adverse effects, but preventable medical errors can happen in any specialty and during all manner of procedures. Here are some of the most commonly cited areas for medical malpractice: Learn More: Florida’s “free-kill” loophole concerns wrongful death lawsuits in the context of medical malpractice. Specifically, it refers to a restrictive exemption buried in the Florida Wrongful Death Act that limits who can and cannot recover certain damages in a medical malpractice-specific wrongful death lawsuit. The provision is a bit complicated. According to §768.21(8), Fl .Stat., a parent whose adult child dies or, vice versa, an adult child whose parent dies, provided that the person who died did not have a spouse or minor child, is forbidden from recovering pain and suffering damages in a wrongful death lawsuit where the death is due to medical malpractice. In other words, in cases where medical malpractice led to a wrongful death, pain and suffering damages are only available to: In effect, this significantly limits the number of wrongful death actions filed on behalf of unmarried adults who have adult children because without pain and suffering damages the cost to litigate a malpractice case may be more than any potential recovery. Florida is the only state in the nation with this type of an exclusion, and it is estimated that more than half the state’s population falls into this no-man’s land. The “Free-Kill” nickname originated because, as the logic goes, a medical professional would prefer a dead patient to an injured and living one because under this exemption a dead patient poses no financial liability, whereas a severely injured—but alive—patient does. Learn More: Unfortunately, there is no silver bullet for winning legal cases of any kind. Each area of law has specific governing statutes, and each case has its own unique fact pattern. That being said, there are fundamentally four elements that are key to a successful medical malpractice case: Though this four-step outline may seem simple, medical malpractice lawsuits are the very complex and labor-intensive because: Learn More: Maybe. Deaths caused by medical malpractice or hospital error are included under the statutory definition of “wrongful death,” which means that deceased person’s survivors and beneficiaries have the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of the decedent. However, “filing a lawsuit” and “being a party to a lawsuit” are different. Under Florida law, only a decedent’s personal representative can actually file a wrongful death lawsuit. Additional beneficiaries may be included as parties to the lawsuit. On the other hand, Florida’s so-called “Free-Kill” loophole (§768.21(8), Fl .Stat.) states that when medical malpractice causes a wrongful death, pain and suffering damages are only available to: This Florida-specific provision effectively bars wrongful death actions filed on behalf of unmarried adults who have adult children because without pain and suffering damages the cost to litigate a malpractice case may be more than any potential recovery. Learn More: It depends on when the malpractice occurred. In general, Florida has a two-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice. But, because medical injuries are not always apparent at first, the two-year timeclock starts from either the occurrence or the discovery of the injury. At most, however, a victim has four years from when the malpractice occurred to initiate a medical malpractice lawsuit. There is one exception to this rule: Fraud. If the healthcare provider intentionally hid their medical malpractice from you, the statute of limitations is two years from the discovery of the injury or seven years from the occurrence of the medical error. Finally, the two-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice cases does not apply to minors. Also, if the malpractice resulted in a wrongful death, the two-year wrongful death statute of limitations comes into effect. Learn More: It depends. Florida currently has no caps for economic damages. If you can prove that you have suffered monetary losses (e.g. medical bills or lost wages), you can recover the full value of those losses, however large the price tag. Generally, though, economic damages tend to be smaller. Noneconomic damages (i.e. “pain and suffering” damages) are a different story. First, they account for the bulk of large recoveries. Second, Florida law caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits. The Florida laws governing noneconomic damages caps have a long and tortuous history dating back to 2003. The worst part about their storied past is that the current status of the noneconomic damages caps is still in flux. In short, despite the various rulings and hubbub, it is likely that noneconomic damages in your medical malpractice lawsuit will be capped at $500,000 for medical practitioners. Learn More:
Medical and Professional Malpractice (7)
Yes. According to §316.2065, Florida Statutes, a bicycle is legally defined as a vehicle and can be operated on roadways. But, because cyclists have the same privileges and rights as other drivers, they have the same responsibilities too. Cyclists must follow all the traffic laws, signs, and controls on public roads. Other key Florida laws for bicyclists include: Learn More: Yes. According to Florida Statutes §316.2065, your bicycle is legally defined as a vehicle, and as such you must follow all the traffic laws, signs, and controls on public roads, including the prohibition against drinking. This means that if you are intoxicated or impaired while riding your bicycle in a dedicated bike lane, in the road, or on the sidewalk, you can be stopped and ticketed for driving under the influence. Additionally, if you were to get into an accident while you were riding drunk or impaired, you could destroy any chance of recovering damages after the accident since the defense would use your intoxication or impairment to argue for your negligence. Learn More: Although one might assume that children and teenagers are more likely to be injured by a negligent driver while riding a bike, the data show that adults in their mid-40s are actually the most common victims of cycling accidents. According to a 2018 HNSTA report, the average age of bicyclists killed in crashes rose from 41 to 47 between 2009 and 2018. The largest number of fatalities come from the 55–59 age group. Men make up a disproportionate number (86%) of bicycle accident fatalities and injuries across all age groups. The population-based fatality rate was 7 times higher for males than for females, and the injury rate was 5 times higher. Learn More: Given that negligent and distracted drivers cause most bicycle crashes, areas in which there is more traffic see higher rates of bicycle accidents, injuries, and fatalities. Unsurprisingly, the majority (79%) of bicycle accident fatalities occur in denser urban areas. However, two-way streets, three-lane roads, and narrow shoulders were much more dangerous than intersections, which accounted for only 29% of bicycle accident fatalities. Learn More: According to a study by NHSTA, certain vehicle types account for significant proportions of bicycle accident fatalities and injuries. The most common vehicles were light trucks (including SUVs, pickups, and vans), which were involved in 45% of all fatal bicycle crashes. Passenger cars, such as coupes, sedans, and small SUVs, also accounted for a high number of fatal accidents (37%). Both light trucks and passenger cars overwhelmingly struck the bicyclists with the front of the vehicle, perhaps implying the drivers did not see the cyclist due to the size of the vehicle or because they were distracted. Learn More: As is the case with motor vehicle accidents, one might assume that more bike accident injuries and fatalities occur at night than during the day. However, a 2018 NHSTA report found that the rates for daytime and nighttime fatalities are roughly the same: 50% of cycling accident fatalities happened during the dark and 46% happened during daylight hours. Learn More: The prevailing belief is that most bicycle crashes in Florida are caused by the negligence of the cyclists. However, this is a false. Data from governmental and private-sector organizations, including the NHTSA, repeatedly show the exact opposite: that negligent and distracted drivers cause most bicycle accidents. Based on many factors such as the angle of impact, location of the crash, and vehicle type, these studies show that cycling accidents are not so much the fault of bike riders disregarding the rules of the road, but rather drivers disregarding the presence of bike riders. Since bicycles are considered vehicles by Florida law, if you are hurt in a bicycle accident due to the negligence of another driver, you have the right to sue the at-fault driver for economic (“special”) and non-economic (“general”) damages. Punitive damages could also be on the table in extreme cases, but you should talk to a lawyer to discuss that option. Economic damages are your compensation for the out-of-pocket expenses related to the injuries you sustained in the bicycle accident including: Non-economic damages are harder to quantify. They often include future harms or injuries that lack specific “replacement” values. You and your lawyer will assign values to these items by their impact on your quality of life, such as: Learn More:
Bicycle Accidents (8)